…outdated, unoriginal, uninspired, and boring. When program evaluation demonstrates that a program has made a human or social impact, it is sometimes labeled as evidence-based. Evidence-based programs are packaged, sometimes commodified, and ‘sold’ — either literally or figuratively — as proven solutions. Other organizations are encouraged to adopt evidence-based programs with full fidelity to the original program design.
This process fully obscures the many contextual/environmental factors that contribute to the achievement of outcomes in pilot sites. It also assumes that the environment is fully controlled so that the impact of the program can be isolated from other influencing variables. It further postulates that what works in and is appropriate for one particular time and place is universally applicable.
I prefer to develop creative programs, co-designed with representatives from the entire community, based on their perception of needs and potential. Not only is this much more fun, it promotes community-led visioning and unique, innovative program design.
Recent PostsSee All
What will my legacy be with this organization? How will I have a positive local and global impact through my work with this organization? What are the strategic priorities of the organization? What is
What specific needs will this organization address? How has the need for this organization been discovered and documented? How will specific community needs be identified and explored? What is my moti
What is our intended impact? What are our specific goals? How will we know if we achieved each of our goals? What is our organization doing to contribute to that intended impact and those specific goa