top of page

The Language of Social Justice

  • Writer: jrdreistadt
    jrdreistadt
  • Nov 27, 2012
  • 1 min read

In social justice conversations and communications, how can we use language that is simultaneously 1) disruptive and 2) constructive that also 3) meets the litmus test of no conflicting or competing implicit assumptions? Should social justice language strive toward meeting these three criteria in order to be effective?

See my handout from a recent presentation for some more thoughts on this topic.

Recent Posts

See All
Resonance

When our internal frequency resonates with that of our environment, we can ease into and flow through any situation. Change inside leads...

 
 
 
Multiple Freedoms

When we talk about freedom, we are usually not specific about the exact type of freedom we are referencing. Freedom exists, or does not,...

 
 
 

Comments


The Fruition Coalition

Lehigh Valley, PA, traditional lands of Lenape Nation

Send email

(c) 2001-2026 The Fruition Coalition.

All Rights Reserved.

bottom of page